Compatibility of chemical and biological plant protection products with the entomoacariphage Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes
Abstract
In vivo evaluation of the effect of insecto-acaricide preparations on the predatory mite Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes has revealed the presence of the acute toxic effects of the preparations Aktara, WDG (kill up to 97,2%), Teppeki, WDG (up to 93,1%), Match, EC (75,7 %). A delayed toxic effect has been noted for the preparations NeemAzal-T / S, EC and Floramite, SC. The preparation Plenum, WDG is rated as harmless in relation to N. barkeri. A weak toxic effect for microbiological preparations Melobass®, пс. and Trichodermin-BL is determined, the preparations Entolek, L, Fungilex, L and M. anisopliae fungus are characterized as harmless in relation to N. barkeri. The assessment of the compatibility of biological and chemical products in planta conditions on cucumber crop has shown the presence of a slight suppressive effect of Teppeki, WDG, Floramite, SC and Entolek, L on the predatory mite N. barkeri in case of their use after the entomoacariphage release. It is determined that the previous plant treatment by none of the studied plant protection products has not adversely affected the life activity and predatory activity of N. barkeri. The effectiveness and the expediency of combining all plant protection products for the red spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch control is shown.
About the Authors
D. V. Voitka
RUE «Institute of Plant Protection»
Belarus
Belarus
a/c Priluki, Minsk district
E. N. Yankovskaya
RUE «Institute of Plant Protection»
Belarus
Belarus
a/c Priluki, Minsk district
S. Yu. Radevich
RUE «Institute of Plant Protection»
Belarus
Belarus
a/c Priluki, Minsk district
L. S. Garko
RUE «Institute of Plant Protection»
Belarus
Belarus
a/c Priluki, Minsk district
M. V. Fedorovich
RUE «Institute of Plant Protection»
Belarus
Belarus
a/c Priluki, Minsk district
References
1. Murphy, G. Are pesticides compatible with biocontrol [Electronic resource] / G. Murphy, R. Buitenhuis, M. Brownbridge // Greenhouse Canada: Annex Business Media publication. – 1998. – Mode of access: https://www.greenhousecanada.com/inputs/biocontrols/are-pesticides-compatible-with-biocontrol-32142. – Date of access: 01.06.2018.
2. Mohiddin, F.A. Tolerance of fungal and bacterial biocontrol agents to six pesticides commonly used in the control of soil borne plant pathogens / F.A. Mohiddin, M.R. Khan // African Journal of Agricultural Research. – 2013. – Vol. 43, № 8. – P. 5331-5334.
3. Mohammadi, A. The influence of pesticides and herbicides on the growth and spore germination of Trichoderma harzianum / A. Mohammadi, Y. Amini // Agriculture Science Developments. – 2015. – Vol. 4, № 3. – P. 41-44.
4. Alumai, A. Tank-Mix compatibility of the entomopathogenic nematodes, Heterorhabditis bacteriophora and Steinernema carpocapsae, with selected chemical pesticides used in turfgrass /A. Alumai, S. Parwinder // Grewal Biocontrol Science And Technology. – 2004. – Vol. 14, № 7. – P. 725-730.
5. Radova, S. Effect of selected pesticides on the vitality and virulence of the entomopathogenic nematode Steinernema feltiae (Nematoda: Steinernematidae) / S. Radova // Plant Protect. Sci. – 2010. – Vol. 46, № 2. – P. 83-88.
6. Laznik, Z. The influence of insecticides on the viability of entomopathogenic nematodes (Rhabditida: Steinernematidae and Heterorhabditidae) under laboratory conditions / Z. Laznik, S. Trdan // Pest Management Science. – 2014. – Vol. 70. – P. 784-789.
7. Schumacher, V. In vitro effect of pesticides on the germination, vegetative growth and conidial production of two strains of Metarhizium anisopliae / V. Schumacher, H.M. Poehling // Fungal Biology. – 2012. – Vol. 116, № 1. – Р. 121-132.
8. Archana, M.R. Interactive effect of entomopathogenic fungi Paecilomyces fumosoroseus with few organophosphate and pyrethroid pesticides: an in vitro study / M.R. Archana, K. Ramaswamy // Indian J. of Fundamental and Applied Life Sciences. – 2012. – Vol. 2, № 2. – P. 10-17.
9. Sapieha-Waszkiewicz, A. Porównanie wpływu preparatów biotechnicznych Bioczos s, Biosept 33 sl i syntetycznych pestycydów na kiełkowanie zarodników grzybów owadobójczych / A. Sapieha-Waszkiewicz, B. Marjańska-Cichoń, R. Miętkiewski // Ochrona środowiska i zasobów naturalnych. – 2010. – Vol. 43. – S. 117-125.
10. Compatibility of the entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana with the insecticides fipronil, pyriproxyfen and hexaflumuron / M. Rashid [et al.] // J. of Entomological Society of Iran. – 2012. – Vol. 31, № 2. – P. 29-37.
11. Compatibility of Isaria fumosorosea (Hypocreales: Cordycipitaceae) blastospores with agricultural chemicals used for management of the asian citrus psyllid Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae) / P. B. Avery [et al.] // Insects. – 2013. – Vol. 4. – P. 694-711.
12. Compatibility of entomopathogenic fungi with neonicotinoid insecticides / P.M.O.J. Neves [et al.] // Neotropical Entomology. – 2001. – Vol. 30, № 2. – P. 263-268.
13. Usha, J. Detection of compatibilty of entomopathogenic fungus Beauveria bassiana (Bals.) Vuill. with pesticides, fungicides and botanicals / J. Usha, M. Naren, V. Padmaja // Intern. J. of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences. – 2014. – Vol. 4, № 2. – P. 613-624.
14. Filho, A.B. Effect of thiamethoxam on entomopathogenic microorganisms / A.B. Filho, J.E.M. Almeida, C. Lamas // Neotropical Entomology. – 2001. – Vol. 30, № 3. – P. 437-447.
15. In vitro compatibility between chemical and biological products used for seed treatment / F. Constantinescu [et al.] // Scientific Papers. Series A. Agronomy. – 2014. – Vol. LVII. – P. 146-151.
16. Mortality risk from entomopathogenic fungi affects oviposition behavior in the parasitoid wasp Trybliographa rapae / L.-M. Rännbäcka [et al.] // J. of Invertebrate Pathology. – 2015. – Vol. 124. – P. 78–86.
17. Entomopathogenic strain of Beauveria bassiana against Frankliniella occidentalis with no detrimental effect on the predatory mite Neoseiulus barkeri: evidence from laboratory bioassay and scanning electron microscopic observation / S. Wu [et al.] // plos ONE. – 2014. – Vol. 9, № 1. – P. 1-7.
18. Анисимов, А.И. О методике и точности учета мучного клеща и амблисейуса при их разведении / А.И. Анисимов, С.А. Доброхотов // Защита и карантин растений. – 2007. – № 11. – С. 33-35.
19. Henderson, C.F. Tests with acaricides against the brow wheat mite / C.F. Henderson, E. W. Tilton // J. Econ. Entomol. – 1955. – Vol. 48. – P. 157-161.
20. Hassan, S.A. Standard methods to test the side-effects of pesticides on natural enemies of insects and mites developed by the IOBC/WPRS Working Group ‘Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms’ / S.A. Hassan [et al.] // EPPO Bulletin. – 1985. – Vol. 15. – P. 214–255.
Review
For citations:
Voitka D.V., Yankovskaya E.N., Radevich S.Yu., Garko L.S., Fedorovich M.V. Compatibility of chemical and biological plant protection products with the entomoacariphage Neoseiulus barkeri Hughes. Plant Protection. 2018;(42):306-315. (In Russ.)
Views: 233
Email this article 
